Terminology could cause costly engineering confusion29 January 2016

Lack of terminology for temporary buildings Lack of terminology for temporary buildings can be a problem

One of the UK's leading manufacturers and installers of temporary buildings has voiced concerns that engineering companies requiring additional space may be being inadvertently misled into ordering the wrong type of structure.

Antony Hunt, managing director of Smart-Space, believes his industry's terminology - or rather the lack of it - is at the root of the problem. The consequence can be short-term, relocatable structures being used for longer-term projects, for which they are inherently unsuitable.

The results, he says, are installations that fail to meet the requirements of the customer and which fail to achieve the planned enhancements to the customer's operation.

“Many people ask for a temporary building when, in fact, it’s not a temporary building they want at all," he said, "What they actually want is a quick, cost-effective alternative to a traditional building. The lack of clear definition between the options open to them causes the issues."

In mainland Europe, relocatable temporary buildings are known as industrial tents. Hunt says that phrase conjours up an image of sagging canvas and really doesn’t create a positive image in the mind of the customer. As a result, it’s a description which has never been widely used or accepted in the UK, although its adoption would help to avoid customer confusion and inadvertent mis-selling.

"Some manufacturers only supply industrial tents, which are relocatable temporary structures with a PVC fabric roof cover," Hunt added. "But they offer them as a solution for facilities requiring longer term, semi-permanent structures with more stringent temperature and safety requirements, or as an alternative to permanent buildings.

"That can be very misleading. Sometimes the customer gets a long way into the project before realising the solution is the wrong one - and that's not good either for them or for their supplier."

In mainland Europe, the 'industrial tent' remains in common parlance, leaving nobody in any doubt as to the very temporary nature of the construction.

"It's the right description for that kind of structure, and it is ideal for customers who want to hire a short-term off-the-shelf modular solution," Hunt continued. "However, it's unlikely to be the right solution for longer-term, semi-permanent or permanent use, such as extra storage space or a semi-permanent on-site project workshop.

"If you're looking for a building which is totally watertight and insulated, which conforms to building and fire regulations, and which may be in place for decades rather than months, then a made-to-order steel-clad building is far more likely to be the right choice."

For businesses who want something more than an industrial tent, but not the capital outlay of a bespoke-made permanent building or extension, Hunt highlights another option which sits right in the middle of the two.

Interim buildings bridge the gap between temporary and permanent buildings because they use the same modular off-the-shelf aluminium frame system as the industrial tents, with the added advantages of a 40mm steel roof and 40mm steel wall cladding. They look, last and perform like a permanent building but are available for rental, so give the customer far more flexibility in terms of the period of use.

"Opting for an industrial tent or something more substantial will depend on a number of factors specific to the business," Hunt concluded. "Taking them all into consideration and knowing the difference between the available options will ensure the engineering company's first decision is the right decision."

Mark Venables

This material is protected by MA Business copyright
See Terms and Conditions.
One-off usage is permitted but bulk copying is not.
For multiple copies contact the sales team.